An official list of approved WIC formulas from the Alaska Department of Health and Social Services WIC.
An Alaska Department of Health and Social Services WIC training video demonstrating how to properly accept fruit and vegetable vouchers from the Alaska WIC program.
An Alaska Department of Health and Social Services WIC training video that outlines policies and procedures for selling WIC approved foods to participants in Alaska.
An Alaska Department of Health and Social Services WIC publication for participants purchasing WIC approved foods in Alaska.
The Alabama WIC app is a one-stop shop to several resources needed when applying for or participating in the Alabama Women, Infant and Children (WIC) Nutrition Program. The app is […]
An Alabama Department of Public Health – Division of WIC publication for vendors on using Electronic Benefit Transfers (EBT) for selling WIC approved foods in Alabama.
An annual plan that details Connecticut WIC Program objectives and procedures for Connecticut WIC Program.
This report summarized workshop presentations and discussions by academic and nutrition professional experts, focusing on how to develop a research agenda for the WIC Program.
This study examines the degree to which food prices, caseloads, and cost-containment practices influenced costs of state WIC food benefits packages. Because few data existed on the actual food items that WIC participants purchased, the study used a scanner dataset of supermarket transactions and other sources to estimate the average monthly cost of WIC food benefits in several areas.
The researchers examines cost-containment practices in six states, including interviews with the various stakeholders and analysis of WIC administrative data. The authors reached three major conclusions: (1) Cost-containment practices reduced average food package costs by 0.2% to 21.4%, depending on practices implemented and local conditions; (2) the cost-containment practices had few adverse outcomes for WIC participants; and (3) administrative costs of the practices were low, averaging about 1.5% of food package savings.
